War On Logos #10: Mighty Dull

Some of you may have been reading War On Logos and have noticed that I’ve ripped on terrible icons of hockey teams from all kinds of leagues except for my own favourite NHL team, the Anaheim Ducks, so I felt that it was only fair that I do the same to one of their logos at some point. Now this team was in the past notorious for their original choice of name and logo (both of which I liked, thank you very much), and even more notorious for one particular jersey, the “Wild Wing”, which has been listed numerous times all over the internet as one of, if not the most hideous things a professional sports team has ever worn… and as much as I wholeheartedly agree, I’m saving that for another time.
Remember back in 2006, when the Mighty Ducks of Anaheim announced that they were officially changing their name to the Anaheim Ducks, with a new logo and colour scheme to sever the team’s remaining ties with the Walt Disney Company? And then the speculation on what new and exciting logo and jersey they were going to unveil? And then how that turned out to be… well, this?

Ever since the Ducks unveiled their new logo, I’ve had mixed feelings about it, kinda like a love-hate relationship. Now you may be asking why I like it, and at the same time, why I dislike it. Well, maybe you should keep reading to find out.
Now I really liked the original duck mask logo, and I didn’t mind the name too much, but at the same time I’ve always felt slightly uncomfortable wearing the old Mighty Ducks jerseys in public. My main reason for that is because over here in the UK, very few people know or care about the existence of an Anaheim Mighty Ducks NHL team, or for that matter the NHL itself (it is a Football/Soccer obsessed nation after all), so people will generally only ever recognise it as something from the sodding Disney film of the same name. Like the hundreds of West Ham and Arsenal and Whatever FC supporters walking around in their shirts, I as a Ducks fan like to show my support for my team by wearing their jersey. The problem is, with a logo that was seen in *groan*… that particular movie, and the fact that very few people know that the team actually exists, some are bound to give funny looks, and then some stupid chavs will point out the obvious by yelling “MARDY DOCKS, YEAH!” or ask me a completely ridiculous question like “Do you play for the Mighty Ducks?” To this day, I still cannot believe someone was stupid enough to ask me that.
This is where my liking of the new look comes in: the Ducks, and in turn me as a fan, are being ridiculed much less as they now look less like a bunch of cartoon superheroes on ice (an image I’d still take any day over the crappy movie), which makes the logo more comfortable to wear in public. I’ve grown used to the look as a whole, and the choice of colours was fairly interesting: a stroke of Orange for Orange County, CA, with Gold – while never being confirmed by the organisation – possibly being a reference to California being known as ‘the Golden State’. The D being shaped like a webbed duck foot is also pretty clever, and then of course, the Ducks won their first Stanley Cup Championship with this logo in 2007.
But really, this logo isn’t all that great, and when it was first unveiled, the first reaction from everyone, not limited to but including Ducks fans, wasn’t much more than “meh”. I mean, really? A wordmark? Was that the best they could come up with? It really was a disappointing unveiling, and today I, and I’m sure many others, still think that it’s a weak identity for a team named the Ducks. What’s even worse is that, for those who are dyslexic and can’t read the script, it probably looks like a spork.
Compared to other teams’ identities, the whole thing feels a bit cheap (and the fact that the Ducks’ graphic design department sucks at graphic design – at the time of writing, anyway – doesn’t really help with their overall image), like they rushed to get something little more than adequate out there in time for the summer of 2006. Some would say it feels more “aggressive” than the previous look, but I fail to see that myself. It looks more as if it was designed to attract the baseball crowd.
If there’s one single thing about the identity as a whole that infuriates me, it’s how the Ducks’ choice of Metallic Gold as a colour, much like the Jade Green (NOT Teal!) that they wore in their Mighty Ducks days, is constantly confused with other colours, because it appears in all kinds of different shades all over the internet. Most of the time it looks brown, so people have confused it with bronze and copper, yet the NHL website has it as a more yellow colour. Take a look at the image below to see how many different versions of this ONE colour exist:

(Note that if you have a nice bright monitor, Web Colour #3 above will appear as the ‘correct’ gold colour)
The fact that different image file formats somehow get the Ducks’ gold mixed up with so many other shades is quite ridiculous, but at least the NHL website seems to acknowledge the fact that it is Gold, albeit in a different shade.
But, if there’s one part of the Ducks’ current identity package that I do really like, it has to be the standalone ‘D’ duck foot logo. As much as it doesn’t actually feature a duck, I’ve grown to really like it for its ingenious simplicity. Many will agree that it can be compared to the Boston Bruins’ B-in-spoked circle, the Calgary Flames’ fiery C … heck, just about any sports team’s logo that incorporates a single letter in a unique and clever way, as a strong identity (sadly, there are some out there who think the D looks more like a UFO, or one of Batman’s weapons than a duck footprint, but there we go). I’d really like to see the D completely replace the boring wordmark on the jersey… but to be honest, I wouldn’t mind seeing the whole look replaced by something better in future like, y’know, a duck. That probably won’t happen for some time, but we can dream, right?
Apologies that this turned out to be a big, long, personal rant. Next issue will see a return to my normal writing style!
I’m Wildwing64, and I declare War On Logos.