Monthly Archives: August 2008

RBK EDGE Premier Jersey – Review

It’s been over a year since Reebok’s new style NHL jerseys were unveiled, so I decided to finally get myself an RBK EDGE Anaheim Ducks jersey, just to see what it was really like. Initially I was sceptical about buying it because I wasn’t too sure how it would fit compared to the old CCM replicas. I originally ordered a Medium, thinking that my normal Small size would be too small, and it turned out to be too big. So I sent that back and exchanged it for the Small size, having to wait a few more weeks until it finally arrived this morning.

Just so you know, this review is going to be completely unbiased, so I’m not going to sulk and rant over how the Edge jerseys have “ruined the NHL forever” (like traditionalists), nor am I going to go into any performance enhancing drivel that certain others tend to bring up (like the NHL, Reebok, and Sidney Crosby), partially because this isn’t the authentic style jersey, and partially also because it’s probably a load of crap anyway.

First of all, the visual differences. On the player, the authentic variant of this jersey looks more form fitting than its baggier predecessor. However, the difference isn’t too great, and after a while we all (or at least, most of us) got used to it. Other changes include the bib-like part at the bottom of the back of the jersey, similar to what baseball jerseys have, then the ‘dreaded’ piping that separates some parts of the jerseys, and which for some teams are coloured seemingly for the sake of it, and finally, the NHL shield at the collar, and the so-called ‘jock tag’ at the bottom left of the front of the jersey, which is seemingly the NHL’s desperate attempt to be more like the other three major sports leagues, particularly the NFL.

Other differences, which are more noticeable when you’re holding it yourself, include the fact that the materials used are much thinner and lighter, and even more so on certain parts of the jersey, than the old CCM replicas. The much lighter material that makes up the back of the jersey is so light that I can’t help but think that I’m accidentally going to rip it while trying to put it on one day, or if it gets caught on a door handle. Also, the arm and body length is longer than on the old jerseys, meaning that if you have shorter arms you’ll need to tuck the ends of the sleeve in just so that it doesn’t get in the way of your hands.

A major concern with fans before the jerseys were unveiled, aside from all teams using a same, singular template league-wide (which turned out to be nothing more than mislead, inaccurate information) was that the jerseys would be too tight and uncomfortable to wear. That however, is mostly untrue. This jersey I have is actually quite comfy, and doesn’t feel entirely different from the old jerseys, aside from the arms which are, as mentioned above, longer and slightly less baggy than the CCM replicas. However, there is one problem; that being the only really tight part of the jersey which interferes with the overall comfort level: the collar.

Unlike on the old jerseys, with which you could easily slip your head through the collar, you now have to struggle just to get your head through it, as demonstrated in the photo below.

This, to be honest, is my biggest problem with the jersey. What’s even more of a pain is taking the jersey off, when once again you have to struggle to get your head through it, which can prove to be even more difficult than it is to put it on. As far as I’m aware, most teams have different collar styles, so I’m not sure whether this issue applies with just the Ducks jerseys, or for any of the other teams, except for some like Buffalo, Colorado and Nashville who use the same style as Anaheim.

Pros:

  • Very comfortable to wear
  • Aside from the sleeves, not much different than the old jerseys
  • Some may prefer the light material used

Cons:

  • The even lighter material is too thin, and feels easy to tear
  • The collar is a pain in the arse (may not apply for some teams)

Overall: It’s very comfortable to wear, just as comfortable as the old jerseys, however I highly recommend trying them on before buying, especially in case you need to try out the different sizes, and make sure you can get your head through the collar.

War On Logos #4: The Bucs Were Raided

Taking a slightly different approach for this edition of ‘War on Logos’, I’m taking a look at a team that doesn’t play in North America. Being a hockey fan living in the UK (and being more of an NHL fan), one of my pet peeves about the majority of UK based teams are logos that are either quite blatantly stolen – sorry, “adopted” from North American teams, or logos that just look bad in general, or in this case, both. I present to you the Romford Raiders.

The first thing you’ll notice, unless you’re not very familiar with sports logos, is that they have put in a recoloured version of the logo that the NFL’s Tampa Bay Buccaneers used between 1976 and 1996, known as ‘Buccaneer Bruce’ by fans (although the Raiders first took the ice in 1987, how they got hold of the Bucs’ logo is beyond me). They have placed a pair of crossed hockey sticks behind him, and added the team name, in the most generic font ever (Times New Roman, anyone?), and called it their logo.

The worst thing about this logo is that it looks like the ‘designer’ hastily cobbled it all together in five minutes on Microsoft PowerPoint or something… although as you can see here, the logo appears as if it’s also been slightly ‘Photoshopped’, having a tacky bevel effect added just for the sake of having it. The bevel doesn’t exist on the jersey logo, but it’s always present on other things like game programmes, leaflets and the team website.

Curiously, sometimes the font used on the logo is more of a blocky font, traditionally used by US based teams such as the Boston Bruins. All this does for Romford’s logo is make it look slightly better, though that’s really not saying much.

I’m having difficulty finding much else to say about this team’s logo, though one thing that does annoy me is the team’s choice of name, the Raiders. Not because they weren’t named after anything (the team apparently named themselves after a military aircraft type, as the London Borough of Havering, in which the town is located, has something to do with the history of aircraft or whatever), but because of that uber-generic sound the team name has, with both the team name and city name beginning with the same letter generic alliteration, something that a lot of other UK based teams are guilty of (some US based teams do that too, but for good reasons). ‘Raiders’ does nothing at all to represent the local area, unless you count the local scumbags that steal from, or rather, ‘Raid’ shops.

If they insisted on going for the military aircraft theme, a better name for them would have been the Spitfires… that is, if it wasn’t being used by their recently formed lower league team, who ironically also have a slightly better logo.

I’m Wildwing64, and I declare War On Logos.

Backyard Hockey DS – Review

"Backyard Hockey" - Atari, Mistic Software

Backyard Hockey (DS)

The Nintendo DS can successfully say it has achieved three milestones.
Firstly, it totally owned the PSP regarding sales, and popularity – bringing gaming to a whole new generation.
Secondly, it revolutionised gaming with touchscreen gaming – giving us new controls and more fun.
Thirdly, it is home to the most painful, poorly made hockey game ever made, and that game I am talking about is “Backyard Hockey”.

I aquired a copy a few days back, out of curiosity to see what the only hockey game on the DS was like, along with the company’s other offerings, such as backyard football – whilst I am not going to review those non hockey games, its worth me adding that they were pretty much just as bad.

So, how is it possible to make a hockey game and fail so badly when your not called EA Montreal and making a PC version of the NHL game. Well, our dear friends at Atari and Mistic software have done just that, except this makes every poorly made hockey game of the last two decades.
Here’s why.

Gameplay

Put the game in, load it up and your faced with a pretty hum drum menu offering seven options – Play now, Pickup Play, Season Play, MIni-Games, Mulitplayer, Options, Extras.

Play now takes you straight to a game setup screen where you choose difficulty, period length and yes, power ups. Already one menu in and the game’s got a gimmick. Using power ups, you can change the way you shoot – rather like in Mario Hoops here a mushroom makes you bigger, however because that is a Mario game, it’s acceptable, here it’s not.
Interestingly, fisticuffs is an option, however I’m yet to get that to appear in game.

The power ups are bad, however it’s when you come to the next screen that my first major beef with this game comes apparent, you cannot choose what team you want to be. For example, I am being forced to play as St. Louis currently – I don’t want to play as them, I am a Dallas fan. So, if you’re a fan of the quickplay mode function on sports games, your not going to be happy, unless you’re a drifter type fan who doesn’t care.

Thankfully, on the next mode of play (pickup play) does feature team selection, however, it’s now become apparent that each conference has 18 teams in it, because for some bizarre reason, the game’s creators thought it would be fun to add their own teams into the NHL leagues, rather than just put them in a separate category. Whilst I am not going to name them all, I will list the ones that made me laugh. namely “Grumpy Frostbites”, “Scrappy Llamas” and “Wobbly Walruses”.
Selecting two teams, you carry on to choose your rink – theres 10 in total, but 2 of them remain locked until you complete a cup, named the BHL, ooh, original name.

So far, this modes more promising, it seems closer to hockey, but then the next screen looses it all. Your asked to choose what side of the puck you want. I can hear the “Eh?” from you now, as suddenly, your questioning whether your playing a football game. However, it then becomes apparent, this is to select what players you want, but I wouldn’t worry if you lose this because all the players to choose seem to suck – apart from a mediocre selection of NHL players who must have had a dump truck of money dumped outside their home to allow this shoddy game to bear their name.
After choosing your team of 7 players, you then have to organise their position – One defense, one center, one forward and one goalie.

The rinks are again, poorly thought out, with the choice being – in a shopping center, on a farm, at a tropical beach or Santa’s village. There’s a few more logical ones, two of which look like they are more adapt to being a place for hockey, namely poorly designed arenas, such as the “humongous rectangular arena”. For a game that’s called backyard hockey, a tropical beach is far from most hockey.
The game now begins, and the top screen is used as a scoreboard, whilst the bottom one shows the action. The controls are simple, D-Pad moves, whilst the face

buttons check, shoot and change player. The problem is, the CPU are way too easy, even on hard. There’s no competition to it. And the sound is terrible. The touchscreen control option can be activated from the menu, but this is even more torturous, as you attempt to flick the puck to the goal, and “tap” to check.
Season play is pretty much as above, but instead you compete in a series of games, to unlock the wonderful extras such as “walrus cave” rink.
The mini games are fun for the first minute, with the choice of shootout, pickup shootout and air hockey.
The shootout hockey game stars same as above, except all you do is shoot on goal.
Once the game begins, its as you would expect, a 1 on 1 scenario. However, the camera seems to zoom out further, making the already tiny sprites seem even tinier. Forcing the camera to zoom makes it better, however, the game looks pixelated. The touchscreen controls here are even worse than in a full game.
The air hockey game however, may be the only redeeming feature of this game. It feels just like a classic arcade game, and for once, the controls work really well – however, I am pretty sure you won’t be buying this game because it has air hockey.
The multi-player mode is pretty much as you get above, however it only supports players with the game as well, meaning you’re unlikely to ever play with anyone, as once your mates have seen the game, laughed in your face, they will not buy it.
Then we get to the final option worth mentioning, the extras.
You have a choice of two, credits and player cards. The credits serve no purpose, unless you’re writing a hate mail list, whilst the player cards is literally a screen telling you about the players in the game, all whom in this mode seem to be wearing Minnesota jerseys. Never imagined i would see Crosby in a MIN jersey, but there we go.

The Graphics

As I mentioned above, the graphics are over pixelated, dull, and marred by poor camera choices (why would you go for the game’s horrible side view).
The ice and rinks are heavily undetailed, and the game creators made a big error in choosing bobble headed characters.

Lastability

You’ll pick it up, attempt one or two games, try the two control modes, realise the awfulness of the game in general, then take it back to Game Stop, and then either get laughed at by the employees, or possibly get $3 on a trade in.

Final Conclusion

This game is an embarrassment to the NHL, and to gaming in general. It’s over blown kiddy image makes it too sappy for even the slightly interested 4 year old (seriously, those hockey playing kids are mean!) and the graphics, gameplay and poor choice of controls just make this even more dire. Please, don’t buy this game.

Rating: 1/10 – “Awful”

(The only reason it gets a 1 is because it does have hockey in it)